Growth economics

Lavoie, M. and E. Stockhammer (2023), ‘Crecimiento impulsado por los salarios: concepto, teorías y políticas’El Trimestre Economicó, 90 (1), 357, enero-marzo 2023, pp. 215-265.

Lavoie, M. and W.J. Nah (2020), ‘Overhead labour costs in a neo-Kaleckian growth model with non-capacity creating autonomous expenditures’Review of Political Economy, 32 ($), pp. 511-537.

Nah, W.J. and M. Lavoie (2019), ‘The role of autonomous demand growth in a neo-Kaleckian conflicting-claims framework’Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, December, 427–444.

Nah, W.J. and M. Lavoie (2019), ‘Convergence in a neo-Kaleckian model with endogenous technical progress and autonomous demand growth’Review of Keynesian Economics, 7 (3), September, pp. 275–291.

Lavoie, M. (2019), ‘Inconsistencies in the note of Dávila-Fernández, Oreiro and Punzo’Metroeconomica, 70 (2), pp. 320–324.

Fiebiger, B. and M. Lavoie (2019), ‘Trends and cycles with external markets: non-capacity generating semi-autonomous expenditures and effective demand’Metroeconomica, 70 (2), pp. 247–262.

Lavoie, M. (2018), ‘Production  functions,  the  Kaldor–Verdoorn  law and methodology’, in Arestis, P. (ed.), Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics: Essays in Honour of John McCombie, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 303–330.

Kim, J.H. and M. Lavoie (2017), ‘Long-run convergence and growth in a two-sector model’Korean Economic Review, 33 (1), Summer, pp. 179–206.

Nah, W.J. and M. Lavoie (2017), ‘Long-run convergence in a neo-Kaleckian open-economy model with autonomous export growth’Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40 (2), pp. 223–238.

Lavoie, M. (2017), ‘The origins and evolution of the debate on wage-led and profit-led regimes’European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 14 (2), pp. 200–221.

Lavoie, M. (2017), ‘Prototypes,  reality  and  the  growth  of  autonomous expenditures: a rejoinder’Metroeconomica, 68 (1), February, pp. 194–199.

Seccareccia, M. and M. Lavoie (2016), ‘Income distribution, rentiers  and their role in a capitalist economy: a Keynes–Pasinetti perspective’International Journal of Political Economy, 45 (3), pp. 200–223.

Kim, J.-H. and M. Lavoie (2016), ‘A two-sector model  with  target-return pricing in a stock–flow consistent framework’Economic Systems Research, 28 (3), pp. 403–427.

Lavoie, M. (2016), ‘Convergence towards the normal rate of capacity utilization in neo-Kaleckian models: the role of non-capacity creating autonomous expenditures’Metroeconomica, 76 (1), pp. 172–201.

Lavoie, M. (2014), ‘Macroeconomic paradoxes with Kalecki and Kaleckians’, in Bellofiore, R., E. Karwowski and J. Toporowski (eds), Economic Crisis and Political Economy, Volume 2 of Essays in Honour of Tadeusz Kowalik, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 198–211.

Lavoie, M. (2013), ‘Sraffians, other post-Keynesians, and the controversy over centres of gravitation’, in Levreto, E.S., A. Palumbo and A. Stirati (eds), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, volume III:Credit, money and crises in post-Keynesian economics Sraffa’s Legacy: Interpretations and Historical Perspectives, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 34–54.

Lavoie, M. and E. Stockhammer (2013), ‘Wage-led growth: Concepts, theories and policies’, in Lavoie, M. and E. Stockhammer (eds), Wage-Led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan and International Labour Office, pp. 13-39.

Lavoie, M. and E. Stockhammer (2012), ‘Wage-led growth: concepts, theories and policies’International Labor Brief, December (in Korean).

Hein, E., M. Lavoie and T. van Treeck (2012), ‘Harrodian instability and the normal rate of capacity utilization in Kaleckian models of distribution and growth: a survey’Metroeconomica, 63 (1), March, pp. 39–69.

Lavoie, M. (2011), ‘Should Sraffians be dropped out of the post-Keynesian school?’, Économies et Sociétés, Oeconomica Series, 45 (7),  June– July, pp. 1027–1059. (Reprinted in Rochon, L.-P. and S. Rossi (eds), Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume I: Issues in Methodology, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.)

Hein, E., M. Lavoie and T. van Treeck (2011), ‘Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: a critical survey’Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35 (3), May, pp. 587–612.

Lavoie, M. (2010), ‘Surveying short-run and long-run stability issues with the Kaleckian model of growth’, in Setterfield, M. (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 132–156.

Lavoie, M. (2010), ‘The possible perverse effects of declining wages’International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 1 (3), May, pp. 260–275.

Lavoie, M. (2009), ‘Cadrisme within a Post-Keynesian model of growth and distribution’Review of Political Economy, 21 (3), July, pp. 371–393.

Lavoie, M. (2009), ‘Towards a post-Keynesian consensus in macroeconomics: reconciling the Cambridge and Wall Street views’, in Hein, E., T. Niechoj and E. Stockhammer (eds), Macroeonomic Policies on Shaky Foundations: Whither Mainstream Economics?, Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 75–99. (Reprinted in Lavoie, M., Post-Keynesian Monetary Theory: Selected Essays, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.)

Lavoie, M. and P. Kriesler (2007), ‘Capacity utilization, inflation and monetary policy: the Duménil and Lévy macro model and the New Consensus’Review  of  Radical  Political  Economics,  39  (4),  Fall, pp. 586–598.

Lavoie, M., G. Rodríguez and M. Seccareccia (2004), ‘Similitudes and discrepancies in Post-Keynesian and Marxist theories of investment: a theoretical and empirical investigation’International Review of Applied Economics, 18 (2), April, pp. 127–149.

Lavoie, M. (2004), ‘Au-delà de la traverse sectorielle de Hicks: croissance insoutenable et flexibilité du système productif’Cahiers d’économie politique, 46, pp. 131–146.

Lavoie, M., G. Rodríguez and M. Seccareccia (2004), ‘Transformational growth, interest rates and the golden rule’, in Argyrous, G., M. Forstater and G. Mongiovi (eds), Growth, Distribution and Effective Demand: Alternative to Economic  Orthodoxies,  Armonk,  NY:  M.E.  Sharpe, pp. 3–22.

Lavoie, M. (2003), ‘Kaleckian effective demand and Sraffian normal prices: towards a reconciliation’Review of Political Economy, 15 (1), January, pp. 53–74.

Henry, J. and M. Lavoie (2002), ‘La traverse de Hicks dans son modèle horizontal bisectoriel: le réaménagement de la structure productive’L’Actualité économique, 78 (1), March, pp. 87–114.

Lavoie, M. (2002), ‘The Kaleckian growth model with target return pricing and conflict inflation’, in Setterfield, M. (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 172–188.

Lavoie, M. and W. Godley (2001–2002), ‘Kaleckian models of growth in a coherent stock–flow monetary framework: a Kaldorian view’Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 24 (2), Winter, pp. 277–312. (Reprinted in Lavoie, M. and G. Zezza (eds) (2012), The Stock-Flow Consistent Approach: Selected Writings of Wynne Godley, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).

Lavoie, M. (2001), ‘Efficiency wages in Kaleckian models of employment’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23 (3), Spring, pp. 449–464.

Lavoie, M. (2000), ‘Government deficits in simple Kaleckian models’, in Bougrine, H. (ed.), The Economics of Public Spending: Debts, Deficits and Economic Performance, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 122–134.

Lavoie, M. (2000), ‘Les taux d’intérêt justes: l’impact des hausses des taux d’intérêt sur le niveau de vie’, in Gaffard, J.-L. and M. Glais (ed.), Monnaie, croissance et marchés: Essais en l’honneur de Jacques Le Bourva, Paris: Économica, pp. 71–86.

Lavoie, M. (1999), ‘Investment functions in Sraffian and Kaleckian models’, Économie appliquée, 52 (1), pp. 119–125.

Lavoie, M. (1999), ‘Capital reversing’, in O’Hara, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Economy, London: Routledge, pp. 58–61.

Lavoie, M. and M. Seccareccia (1999), ‘Interest rate: fair’, in O’Hara, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Economy, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 543–545.

Lavoie, M. (1999), ‘Sraffian and post-Keynesian linkages’, in O’Hara, P. (ed.),  Encyclopedia  of  Political  Economy,  London:  Routledge, pp. 1095–1098.

Lavoie, M. (1998), ‘The neo-Pasinetti theorem in Cambridge and Kaleckian models of growth and distribution’Eastern Economic Journal, 24 (4), Fall, pp. 419–436.

Lavoie, M. (1998), ‘Simple comparative statics of class conflict in Kaleckian and Marxian short-run models’Review of Radical and Political Economics, 30 (3), Summer, pp. 101–113.

Henry, J. and M. Lavoie (1997), ‘The Hicksian traverse as a process of reproportioning: some structural dynamics’Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8 (2), June, pp. 157–175.

Lavoie, M. (1997), ‘Pasinetti’s vertically hyper-integrated sectors and natural prices’Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21 (4), July, pp. 453–468.

Lavoie, M. and P. Ramírez-Gastón (1997), ‘Traverse in a two-sector Kaleckian model of growth with target return pricing’Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 55 (1), March, pp. 145–169.

Lavoie, M. (1996–97), ‘Real wages, employment structure and the aggregate demand curve in a Kaleckian short-run model’Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 19 (2), Winter, pp. 275–288. (Reprinted in Sawyer,  M.C. (ed.), The Legacy of Michal Kalecki, Intellectual Legacies in Modern Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1999.)

Lavoie, M. (1997), ‘Fair rates of interest in post-Keynesian political economy’, in Teixeira, J. (ed.), Issues in Modern Political Economy, Brasilia: University of Brasilia Press, pp. 123–137. (Reprinted in Lavoie, M., Post-Keynesian Monetary Theory: Selected Essays, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.)

Lavoie, M. (1996), ‘Traverse, hysteresis, and normal rates of capacity utilization in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution’Review of Radical Political Economics, 28 (4), pp. 113–147.

Lavoie, M. (1996), ‘Unproductive outlays and capital accumulation with target-return pricing’Review of Social Economy, 54 (3), Fall, pp. 303–321.

Lavoie, M. (1996), ‘La traverse kaleckienne dans un modèle d’accumulation à deux secteurs avec coût complet: à la recherche d’une synthèse post-classique’Cahiers d’économie politique, 26, pp. 127–164.

Lavoie, M. (1996), ‘El modelo kaleckiano de crecimiento y distribución y su crítica neo-ricardiana y neo-marxiana’, Revista Buenos Aires Pensamiento Económico, 2, Spring, pp. 97–145.

Lavoie, M. (1995), ‘The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques’Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (6), December, pp. 789–818. (Reprinted in Sawyer, M.C. (ed.), The Legacy of Michal Kalecki, Intellectual Legacies in Modern Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1999.)

Lavoie, M. (1995), ‘Interest rates in post-Keynesian models of growth and distribution’Metroeconomica, 46 (2), June, pp. 146–177. (Reprinted in Rochon, L.-P. and S. Rossi (eds), Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume III: Employment, Distribution, Growth, Development, Asset Bubbles and Financial Crises, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.)

Lavoie, M. (1993), ‘A post-classical view of money, interest, growth and distribution’, in Mongiovi, G. and C. Ruhl (eds), Macroeconomic Theory: Diversity and Convergence, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–21.

Lavoie, M. (1992), ‘Éléments d’analyse d’une synthèse post-classique’L’Actualité économique, 68 (4), pp. 607-631.

Lavoie, M. (1992), ‘A moeda em um programa de pesquisa comum para o pós-keynesianismo e o neo-ricardianismo’, Revista de Economia Politica, 12 (3), July–September, pp. 107–129.

Lavoie, M. (1992), ‘Towards a new research programme for post-Keynesianism and neo-Ricardianism’Review of Political Economy, 4 (1), pp. 37–79. (Reprinted in Rochon, L.-P. and S. Rossi (eds), Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume I: Issues in Methodology, The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017.)

Lavoie, M. (1990), ‘Thriftiness, growth and the post-Keynesian tradition’, Économies et Sociétés, 23 (7), pp. 123–134.